WHAT WE DO
Under traditional models, dispute resolution processes often involve high and uncertain costs, creating significant financial exposure. We restructure this framework by introducing an alternative model in which cost and risk are more evenly and rationally allocated.
We do not adopt a one-size-fits-all approach. Each case is assessed individually by taking into account the company’s financial structure, the law firm’s operating model, and the legal and commercial characteristics of the dispute. Based on this assessment, tailored financing and risk-sharing structures are developed for each specific matter.
Through this approach, disputes are no longer treated solely as legal issues, but are repositioned as manageable financial decisions.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Each dispute is subject to a multi-dimensional analysis. This assessment focuses not only on the legal merits of the case, but also on recovery prospects and commercial outcomes.
Our key evaluation criteria include:
As a result of this comprehensive analysis, financing is provided only for cases that are considered sustainable and commercially rational.
SOLUTION AREAS
Area 01
For companies, dispute processes often create significant cash outflows and balance sheet pressure.
Through our structures:
Litigation and arbitration costs can be taken off-balance sheet,
Working capital is preserved,
Legal claims can be managed in a more structured and sustainable manner.
This allows companies to pursue claims independently from their operational cash flow.
ExamineArea 02
For law firms, one of the main challenges lies in bearing significant upfront costs while fee recovery is deferred over time.
Through our financing models:
Litigation expenses are funded,
The timing mismatch between costs and fee recovery is reduced,
A portfolio-based approach is supported.
This enables law firms to manage a greater number of cases more efficiently.
ExamineArea 03
Not all disputes share the same dynamics. Accordingly, financing structures are tailored by taking into account the legal nature of the dispute, its risk profile, and the likelihood of recovery.
Our core areas of focus include:
Antitrust:: Cartel claims, abuse of dominance, and competition damages actions
Asset Recovery:: Cross-border asset tracing, enforcement, and debt recovery proceedings
Bankruptcy:: Disputes arising out of insolvency, restructuring, and reorganization processes
General Commercial Litigation:: Contractual disputes, commercial claims, and inter-company conflicts
International Arbitration:: Both investment arbitration and international commercial arbitration
Patent & IP:: Disputes relating to patents, trademarks, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights
Securities Litigation:: Investor claims, misrepresentation, and market misconduct cases
Within each of these areas, financing structures are developed by carefully considering the duration, cost profile, and recovery dynamics of the dispute.
ExamineSCOPE
Our financing models can be structured on either a:
Single-case basis, or
Portfolio basis (covering multiple disputes)
This flexibility provides a significant advantage, particularly for companies and law firms handling multiple disputes.
STRUCTURE
The financing model is fundamentally based on cost funding and risk-sharing.
Within this framework:
Litigation and arbitration costs are covered,
Financial risk is largely assumed,
Fees are payable only upon success and actual recovery.
Unlike traditional hourly billing models, this structure aligns the economic interests of all parties involved.
